Cartes graphiques : le comparatif performances mis à jour

A couple of weeks ago, I posted [this performance chart](https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1mx49ey/performance_chart_for_gamers_looking_to_buy_used/), based on **aggregated benchmark results**, to be able to better **compare the gaming performance of the various Nvidia GPUs**.

Based on the feedback I got from that project, I have now revised and expanded the ranking, to include not only Nvidia GPUs but also those from **AMD** and **Intel**. You can access this new ranking, together with all the data it is based on, via [this link](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRgu7g3uNNa8RpIC-SQr-PC9IcduMzVWaZNDG3qjEab1AkdoU6fuKPufPdto2_FS7ICPFiFhF1ixO8i/pubhtml).

The list is not complete, but includes most of the graphics cards released from 2015 and onwards, even including some professional cards, mining cards et cetera.

The main purpose of this exercise is *not* to aid dick-swinging regarding who has the best GPU, but rather to **aid people who are in the market for used GPUs to better assess the relative price-to-performance between various offerings**. Ie, the important thing to take away from this aggregation is not that the 8GB 5060 Ti is ranked higher than the 8GB 9060 XT, for example, but rather that they are very, very close to each other in performance.

Furthermore, the linked spreadsheet contains specific rankings for **1080p**, **1440p** and **4K**, though these (especially the 1080p one) are based on fewer benchmarks and are thus not as reliable as the overall chart.

You can read more about [the methodology](https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1nki8qo/comment/ney1hg9/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button) in my comments to this post, but the most important thing is that the raw performance score is **pure raster performance** (no upscaling, no ray tracing, etc) based on data from eight different 3DMark benchmarks (two are 1080p, two are 1440p and four are 4K) as well as the techpowerup performance ranking.

This raw performance score is then adjusted for 1) punishing cards with less than 16GB of VRAM and 2) features and functionalities (such as upscaling tech, I/O support and raytracing). How much weight to assign each of these factors will always be more or less arbitrary and heavily dependent on use case, but I’ve tried to be as methodical and factually grounded as I can.

**Note:** GPUs listed in parentheses are ones where the benchmark data was scarce (based on a small number of benchmark runs) and/or had to be inferred from other scores. The ratings for these GPUs (such as the non-XT 9060) are thus to be taken with a reasonable pinch of salt.

**EDIT:** Several people have commented that the aggregated benchmark results would be more reliable if I only based them on benchmark runs conducted at core GPU clock and memory clock settings. While true in theory, it is not so in practice. See [this comment](https://www.reddit.com/r/nvidia/comments/1nki8qo/comment/nf2w6lc/?context=3&utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button) for more information (and a bonus comparison spreadsheet!).